MARKET
SuperShark Cycle · From the course · 12 min read

7 SuperShark Cycle lessons the 2021–2022 crash proved, with real numbers

By TradingPrimer · @TradingPrimer · Published

Students of the SuperShark course always ask the same thing: “The rules sound right — would they actually have worked?” So we took nine of today’s sector leaders, pulled their weekly candles, and ran the course rules through the last full crash, lot by lot. Seven lessons came out, each with the numbers behind it.

9 coins tested10 lots of $1,000 eachReal weekly candles
Quick answer. Re-run on weekly candles, the SuperShark course rules held up in the 2021–2022 crash: the top layer 1s fell 73–82%, second-tier chains and non-L1 leaders 90–94%. Buying each coin only in its own zone, in 10 equal lots, would have returned 3.9× to 7× the average cost by the next cycle high. The biggest single lesson: the depth you buy at matters more than the coin.
SuperShark Cycle infographic, Same coin, same crash: AVAX 2021 to 2022. Left, Wrong zone, bought from −70% to −85%: four coin stacks on the −70%, −75%, −80% and −85% ticks before the low at −92.8%, result 2.1x at the next high. Right, Right zone, bought from −85% to −95%: coins on the −85% and −90% ticks, an empty circle at −95% that was never reached, result 4.2x. Caption: Buy depth matters more than the coin.
Lesson 2 in one picture: AVAX, same crash, two zones. Illustration; the numbers are measured below.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • The zones matched reality. BTC fell 77.6%, ETH 81.9%, BNB 73.5%; AVAX 92.8%, NEAR 94.0%; LINK 90.0%, UNI 92.6%, AAVE 93.1% from their 2021 highs.
  • Depth beat coin choice. AVAX bought on its own −85% → −95% zone returned 4.2×; the same coin on a top-L1 zone returned 2.1×.
  • Unspent money is a feature. Bitcoin filled only 5 of 10 lots (average $18,255) — and still returned 6.9× on what it bought.
  • Nobody needs the exact top. Ten sell orders from 5× to 8× the bottom all filled before Bitcoin’s 2025 high of $126,200.
The one line behind every lesson“Buy when the sharks buy, sell when they sell.”

Large holders can only push a coin up after the crowd has sold out of it. The crash is where that happens, so the crash is where the course buys. The full rules are on the SuperShark Cycle Method page and in the app’s How it works tab; this page tests them.

1Did each group really fall as deep as the course says?

Yes — closely. The course gives every group its own buy zone from the cycle high: −70% → −85% for BTC, ETH, SOL and BNB; −85% → −95% for second-tier chains like AVAX and NEAR; −85% → −97% for sector leaders that are not layer 1s, such as LINK, AAVE and UNI.

−73.5% to −96.9%How far the nine leaders fell from their 2021 high (weekly candles).
3.9× to 7.0×What each coin’s own zone, in 10 lots, was worth at the next cycle high.
2021–2022 crash measured from weekly candles, then each coin run through its own SuperShark Cycle zone with 10 lots of $1,000
CoinGroup2021 cycle highCrash lowFallWeeks downZoneLots filledAverage costNext cycle highMultiple of cost
BTCTier 1 L169,000 (Nov 2021)15,476 (Nov 2022)-77.6%54−70% → −85%5 of 1018,255126,2006.9×
ETHTier 1 L14,866 (Nov 2021)881.16 (Jun 2022)-81.9%31−70% → −85%8 of 101,1464,9574.3×
SOLTier 1 L1259.85 (Nov 2021)7.960 (Dec 2022)-96.9%60−70% → −85%10 of 1055.72295.885.3×
BNBTier 1 L1691.62 (May 2021)183.42 (Jun 2022)-73.5%57−70% → −85%3 of 10195.511,3767.0×
AVAXL1 second tier146.90 (Nov 2021)10.56 (Dec 2022)-92.8%58−85% → −95%8 of 1015.4365.374.2×
NEARL1 second tier20.61 (Jan 2022)1.229 (Dec 2022)-94.0%49−85% → −95%9 of 102.0049.0124.5×
LINKLeader, not L152.99 (May 2021)5.303 (Jun 2022)-90.0%57−85% → −97%4 of 106.79830.934.6×
AAVELeader, not L1665.29 (May 2021)45.68 (Jun 2022)-93.1%56−85% → −97%7 of 1068.67414.266.0×
UNILeader, not L145.00 (May 2021)3.327 (Jun 2022)-92.6%58−85% → −97%6 of 105.04419.463.9×

The top four layer 1s stopped inside or near their zone — except Solana, whose collapse after the FTX failure (−96.9%) went straight through it. Every second-tier chain and non-L1 leader fell 90% or more. That is why the course says: not one dollar on them before −85%, however cheap they look at −60%.

Screenshot of the TradingPrimer live chart, BTC/USDT weekly, May 2021 to March 2023: a horizontal ray at the cycle high of 69,000 (week of 8 Nov 2021), a shaded buy zone from 20,700 (−70%) down to 10,350 (−85%), and a ray at the cycle low of 15,476 (week of 21 Nov 2022) sitting inside the zone.
Screenshot: BTC/USDT 1W on the TradingPrimer live chart, captured 4 Oct 2026. High 69,000 and low 15,476 drawn with the chart’s ray tool; the box is the Tier 1 zone, 20,700 → 10,350. The low came 54 weeks after the high, at −77.6%. Open this chart on the live chart.

2Why does the buy depth matter more than the coin?

Because the same coin, in the same crash, gave twice the result depending only on where the lots were placed. AVAX peaked at $146.90 and bottomed at $10.56 (−92.8%) in December 2022. Next cycle high: $65.37.

Wrong zone · −70% → −85%

The zone meant for BTC, ETH, SOL and BNB. All 10 lots fill between $44.07 and $22.04 — every dollar spent long before the bottom.

Average $31.50 → only 2.1× at the next high.

Right zone · −85% → −95%

AVAX’s own zone. Eight lots fill from $22.04 down to $10.61; the last two never trigger, so $2,000 stays in USDT.

Average $15.43 → 4.2× at the next high.

In class this is the moment students go quiet. They spent months choosing between coins; the course spends that energy on the group each coin belongs to. The right coin at the wrong depth is still a mediocre trade.

3Is it a failure when half the money is never spent?

No — it is the rule working. Each coin’s money is split into 10 equal lots (6 to 10 in My plan), spaced evenly so the tenth lot spends the last dollar exactly at the floor of the zone. Nobody knows where the bottom is; the plan just cannot be caught with an empty wallet.

Bitcoin 2022 · cycle high $69,000 · zone −70% → −85% · $10,000, lots of $1,000
  1. Lots 1–5 fill at $20,700 · $19,550 · $18,400 · $17,250 · $16,100$5,000 in
  2. Lot 6 waits at $14,950 — the low is $15,476never fills
  3. Lots 6–10 stay as USDT$5,000 kept
Bought0.2739 BTC$18,255 a coin
At the next high ($126,200)6.9×on the money invested

Half the money never spent — and the half that was spent did very well.

The opposite case: Solana fell through its −85% floor to −96.9%, so all ten lots were spent by $38.98 and the price kept falling for weeks. The $55.72 average still became 5.3× — but only because Solana kept its users. Lots protect you from running out of money early; they cannot protect you from a coin that dies.

4How do rebounds lower your cost without new money?

Long bottoms bounce. The course uses a bounce only when all three conditions are true:

  • More than half of the coin’s money is invested
  • You hold at least three lots
  • The price rebounds above your most expensive lot (+5%)

Then you sell that one lot and buy it back 30% below where you sold.

Example · $10,000 in a coin, lots of $1,000
  1. Six lots bought at $25, $24, $23, $22, $21, $2060% invested
  2. Rebound to $26.25 — sell the $25 lot (40 coins)$1,050 USDT
  3. Price falls to $18.38 — buy back57.14 coins
Before268.22 coins$22.37 a coin
After285.36 coins$21.03 a coin

The same $6,000 — 17 more coins, a lower average.

If the second dip never comes: you hold $1,050 in USDT plus five lots, so you are still in the wave — just with fewer coins than before.

5Why sell in 10 orders instead of waiting for the top?

Because nobody sells the top, and the course does not ask you to. Bitcoin, continuing the case from lesson 3:

  1. Capital back at 2×

    The $5,000 position doubled at about $36,511. Selling 0.1369 BTC returned the whole $5,000; the rest cost nothing.

  2. 10 equal sell orders across the targets

    Targets are multiples of the cycle low — 5× to 8× for the top four layer 1s. For $15,476 that meant orders evenly spaced from $77,380 to $123,808. The 2025 high of $126,200 filled all ten: 0.1369 BTC sold at an average of $100,594, about $13,776 on top of the $5,000 already back.

    BTC · ETH · SOL · BNB5×–8×the bottom
    Everything else6×–10×the bottom

Had the top stopped at $100,000, half of those orders (up to $98,015) would still have filled. Spreading the orders is what makes the plan independent of guessing the peak.

6Why isn’t a deep fall enough on its own?

Because depth only matters for coins that pass the eight criteria — real demand, #1–2 of the sector, easy staking, serious funding or revenue, a clear edge, a known team, still cheap against its rival, and money flowing in. When we opened the Portfolio on 4 October 2026, three coins sat in their buy zones:

Screenshot of the All coins tab in the TradingPrimer SuperShark Cycle Portfolio: SUI shows Review 9/11 criteria and Buy zone at −78% from high (box 1); PYTH Review 5/9 and Buy zone at −93%; APT shows Fails 6/11 criteria (box 2) and Buy zone at −96% with a Keep button instead of Pick.
Screenshot: the Portfolio “All coins” tab, captured 4 Oct 2026. ① SUI at −78%, inside its −75% → −95% zone. ② APT is deeper (−96%) but Fails on 6 of 11 criteria, so the plan puts no money in it.

APT was the cheapest-looking of the three and the only one the method refused.

Ask this before “how far has it fallen?”“Will the sharks need this coin next cycle?”

7How does the Bitcoin trend tell you whether to keep waiting?

Altcoins only rise while Bitcoin rises or moves sideways. The course reads RSI 14 (see RSI) on Bitcoin’s 1W, 2W and 3W charts against an EMA 9 and a WMA 45 drawn on the RSI. All three below both lines = a long-term downtrend: sell the altcoins and the unsold part of the BTC plan, wait in USDT. It is a slow signal, so the plan’s sell orders usually act first; the trend rule is the safety exit.

Phone screenshot of the BTC trend tab in the SuperShark Cycle Portfolio: Cycle clock reads Early recovery; Bitcoin −32% from $126,200; 51 weeks since the top, cycle high confirmed; weekly frames 1W up, 2W, 3W and 1M down (boxed); leaders in buy zone 2 of 17, SUI and PYTH.
Screenshot: the BTC trend tab on a phone, captured 4 Oct 2026. ① Only 1W has turned up; 2W, 3W and 1M are still down — “Early recovery… it can still be a bear-market rally”.

On 4 October the reading was Early recovery: Bitcoin −32% from $126,200, 51 weeks after the top, and only 2 of 17 leaders (SUI, PYTH) in their zones.

Hold what the plan bought, buy only at your levels, sell only at the plan’s levels.

Where can these lessons mislead you?

Survivorship

All nine coins are leaders today. The same cycle wiped out LUNA and FTT completely — which is why the criteria are re-checked every cycle and the money is spread across several leaders.

One cycle, one sample

The multiples show what the rules did once, not what they will do next time. The falls took 31 to 60 weeks and the recoveries longer: the course is measured in years.

Feeds differ a little

Candles here are Gate.io (AAVE from MEXC, BTC from Binance to match the chart). The app’s How it works tab uses Bybit, so a high or low can differ by a few dollars.

Common mistakes students make with these lessons

  1. One zone for every coin.Lesson 2: it halves the result.
  2. Buying early because a coin is “already down 60%”.−60% is not −85%. Do not break the plan to buy sooner.
  3. Most of the money in the first lot.Fear of missing the bottom. The tenth lot exists for the day you are most scared.
  4. Chasing the rebound with unspent USDT.Unspent money is a result, not a mistake.
  5. Waiting for the exact top.Let the 10 sell orders work.
  6. Holding altcoins through a Bitcoin weekly downtrend.When 1W, 2W and 3W RSI are all below both lines, everything falls — even coins that already fell.

Frequently asked questions

Would the SuperShark Cycle have made money in the 2021–2022 crash?

On the nine leaders tested, every coin bought in its own zone with 10 equal lots was worth 3.9× (UNI) to 7.0× (BNB) its average cost at the next cycle high. That is a backtest on coins that survived, not a promise.

Which coin gave the clearest lesson?

AVAX. The same coin returned 4.2× when bought on its own −85% → −95% zone and only 2.1× on the −70% → −85% zone meant for Bitcoin, Ether, Solana and BNB.

Why did Bitcoin fill only half its lots?

Its low of $15,476 was −77.6% from $69,000, above the sixth lot at $14,950. The plan kept the other $5,000 in USDT instead of guessing the bottom.

Where can I run the same check on my own coins?

In the free SuperShark Cycle Portfolio: open a coin to see its cycle high, zone and lots, or use Coin plans to set your own capital and lot count.

Read the full method, then try it

The rules behind these seven lessons — groups, zones, criteria, lots and the money plan — are on one page.

Related reading: the maths of cycle investing · the emotional cycle · drawdown · dollar-cost averaging · Shark Notes.

Sources and method: rules from the SuperShark course as coded in the TradingPrimer Portfolio (rules dated 26 Sep 2026). Crash depths and next highs: weekly candles from TradingPrimer’s cycle-candles feed (Gate.io; AAVE from MEXC; BTC from Binance to match the chart), 2021–2025, measured 4 Oct 2026. Current readings: TradingPrimer Portfolio, 4 Oct 2026. Every lot, average and target is arithmetic you can redo from those prices.

Education, not financial advice. Past cycles do not guarantee future results, and any coin can fail.